A Taliban propagandist couldn't make this stuff up
Afghanistan's comically fraudulent election is won by the fraudster! With foreigners visibly involved in the process, the words "occupation," "puppet government," and the like undoubtedly ring ever truer in Afghan ears, you don’t have to be a propaganda genius to exploit this sort of thing. And this is the "democracy" dozens of UK and US soldiers died to protect!
By Tom Engelhardt
TomDispatch
02 November 2009
In the worst of times, my father always used to say, "A good gambler cuts
his losses." It’s a formulation imprinted on my brain forever. That no-nonsense
piece of advice still seems reasonable to me, but it doesn’t apply to American
war policy. Our leaders evidently never saw a war to which the word "more"
didn’t apply. Hence the Afghan War, where impending disaster is just an invitation
to fuel the flames of an already roaring fire.
Here’s a partial rundown of news from that devolving conflict: In the last
week, Nuristan, a province on the Pakistani border, essentially fell
to the Taliban after the U.S. withdrew its forces from four key bases.
Similarly in Khost, another eastern province bordering Pakistan where U.S. forces once
registered much-publicized gains (and which Richard Holbrooke, now President
Obama’s special envoy to the region, termed "an American success story"), the
Taliban is largely in control. It is, according
to Yochi Dreazen and Anand Gopal of the Wall Street Journal, now
"one of the most dangerous provinces" in the country.
Similarly, the Taliban insurgency, once largely restricted to the Pashtun south, has recently spread
fiercely to the west and north. At the same time, neighboring Pakistan
is an increasingly destabilized
country amid war in its tribal borderlands, a terror
campaign spreading
throughout the country, escalating American drone attacks, and increasingly
testy relations between
American officials and the Pakistani government and military.
Meanwhile, the U.S. command in Afghanistan is considering a strategy that
involves pulling back from the countryside and focusing on protecting
more heavily populated areas (which might be called, with the first
U.S. Afghan War of the 1980s in mind, the Soviet
strategy). The underpopulated parts of the countryside would then undoubtedly
be left to Hellfire missile-armed American drone aircraft.
Disaster
In the last week,
three U.S. helicopters – the only practical
way to get around a mountainous country with a crude, heavily mined system
of roads – went down under questionable circumstances (another potential sign
of an impending Soviet-style
disaster).
Across the country, Taliban attacks are up; deadly roadside bombs
or IEDs are fast on
the rise (a 350-percent jump since 2007); U.S. deaths are at a
record high and the numbers of wounded are rising
rapidly; European allies are ever less willing to send more troops; and
Taliban raids in
the capital, Kabul, are on the increase. All this despite a theoretical
12-1 edge U.S., NATO, and Afghan troops have over the Taliban insurgents
and their allies.
In addition, our nation-building "partner," the hopeless Afghan President
Hamid Karzai – known in better times as "the mayor of Kabul" for his government’s
lack of reach – was the "winner" in an election in which, it seemed, more ballot
boxes were stuffed than voters arrived at the polls.
In its wake, and in the
name of having an effective "democratic" partner in Afghanistan, the foreigners
stepped in: Sen. John Kerry, Richard Holbrooke, and other envoys appeared in
Kabul or made telephone calls to whisper
sweet somethings in ears and twist
arms. The result was a second
round of voting slated for Nov. 7 and likely only to compound
the initial injury.
No matter the
result – and Abdullah Abdullah, Karzai’s opponent, has already withdrawn
in protest from the runoff – the winner will, once again, be the Taliban.
(And let’s not forget the recent New York Times revelation
that the president’s alleged drug-kingpin brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, whom
American officials regularly and piously denounce, is, in fact, a long-term
paid agent of the CIA and its literal landlord in the southern city of Kandahar.
If you were a Taliban propagandist, you couldn’t
make this stuff up.
With the second round of elections already a preemptive disaster, and foreigners
visibly involved in the process, all of this is a Taliban bonanza. The words
"occupation," "puppet government," and the like undoubtedly ring ever truer
in Afghan ears. You don’t have to be a propaganda genius to exploit this sort
of thing.
See also:
What Matthew Hoh says is irrefutable: but is Obama listening?
Voices of conscience: Matthew Hoh and L/Cpl Joe Glenton |