How to win in Afghanistan No. 147: Rent-a-Taliban and roll in our "government in a box"
Apparently, Gen.Stanley A. McChrystal, the top American commander in Afghanistan, thinks you can bring in a government as easily as he requisitions more meals-ready-to-eat for his
troops.
By Terry Michael
Reason
18 February 2010
Taliban guns for hire?
"We've got a government in a box, ready to roll in," Gen.
Stanley A. McChrystal, the top American commander in Afghanistan,
told
The New York Times last week about the largest
military offensive since an American-led coalition invaded the
country in 2001.
Six thousand U.S. Marines, plus British and Afghan
forces, descended on a Taliban stronghold in Marja, in the southern
Helmand Province, a mission described as a "test" of America’s new
counter-insurgency strategy designed to win over civilians and
establish order, all while chasing away or killing Taliban
fighters.
Government in a box? What a foolish thing to say, what hubris.
Ironically, it’s probably more truth than the general wanted to
reveal about American manipulation of the Afghan "government." But
what should we expect when we put a military commander—underscore
the word commander—in charge of a nation-building folly.
Apparently, the general thinks you can bring in a government as
easily as he requisitions more meals-ready-to-eat for his
troops.
Of course, we’ll get a result as tasty as those MREs. The
outcome will be what any intelligent observer with a sense of
history will understand--a client government in name only, in a
failed non-state, rife with corruption.
Sounds familiar
If that sounds familiar,
you probably know what we tried unsuccessfully with an earlier
American client regime, in “South” Vietnam in the early 1960s. And
it’s what another general touted by the Military Industrial
Complex, David Petraeus, did with his rent-a-bad-guy
“counterinsurgency strategy” in Iraq, heralded by neocon loonies as
the “victory” for their elective war.
The Times story that quoted McChrystal’s nonsense
appeared under the headline, “Afghan Offensive Is New War Model.”
“Marja is intended to serve as a prototype for a new type of
military operation,” the Times correspondent wrote, “based on the
counterinsurgency thinking propounded by General McChrystal in the
prelude to President Obama’s decision in December to increase the
number of American troops here to nearly 100,000. More than at any
time since 2001, American and NATO soldiers will focus less on
killing Taliban insurgents than on sparing Afghan civilians and
building an Afghan state.”
Well, that’s an improvement over President Lyndon Johnson’s
napalming distant villages in Vietnam in order to save them. But
military nation-building is still a fool’s errand, particularly
when there is no indigenous infrastructure to build a nation, let
alone build a liberal democracy.
Dr. Nadir Atash, an Afghan native who has mostly lived in the
United States since he came here as a student in the 1960s,
recently made that point to me as we both sat in the guest waiting
room of RT-TV. I was there to assess the first-year
failures of President Barack Obama, and he followed me to
discuss how McChrystal’s Afghan adventure was doomed to fail.
No breakthrough
“This (the assault on Marja) is not a break through,” said
Atash, who recently authored a memoir,
Turbulence: The Tumultuous Journey of One Man's Quest for
Change in Afghanistan. After a career in teaching and
building a successful business, Atash went back to Afghanistan
after the U.S. removed the Taliban from Kabul in 2001, hoping to
help restore a nation assaulted by the Soviets in the 1980s and
terrified by the Taliban in the 1990s.
Military efforts won’t produce anything lasting, Atash told RT TV. We
first “need to focus on [instilling] rule of law, [ending]
corruption and creating jobs.”
He had some real-life experience battling corruption in the
Karzai government when he returned to Afghanistan in 2001. He was
asked to head the state-owned airlines, but finally gave up and
returned to the U.S. in 2006 after failing to make headway for
years.
For those who advocate following Petraeus’ Iraq model of trying
to purchase peace, Atash had this to say in his interview: “We
cannot buy peace. Maybe time. But it is sure to backfire. The
insurgents are fighting for ideology, not money.” The
rent-a-Taliban theory, he noted, “was cooked up by the Afghan
government” and its American and NATO “allies”, who, he said, “only
see dollar signs.”
The Obama-McChrystal military “solution” for Afghanistan, which
fell on Presidents Day weekend, should remind the
historically-informed of America’s own efforts to build a
nation-state in the New World. Our founders created an indigenous
movement for liberal democracy. They were nobody’s clients.
If Barack Obama hopes to join George Washington and Abraham
Lincoln in the pantheon of wise American leaders, our very brainy
president needs to stop outsmarting himself. He needs to study—and
understand—the lessons of our failed attempts to impose
liberal democracy where no indigenous liberal or democratic
movements existed. Gen. McChrystal is no Gen. Washington. And thus
far, Barack Obama doesn’t resemble the founder of his political
party, Thomas Jefferson. |