"If a country has sent its young men to another country to die, to restore - create democracy, you'd expect, well you'd expect a bit of gratitude, wouldn't you?" - John Humphreys, BBC

It is well known that the US used depleted uranium weapons in Iraq during the 1991 Gulf war; and Iraqis, at least, are well aware of the increases in cancers and infant mortality rates.

The latest study found that in Fallujah, more than half of all babies surveyed were born with a birth defect between 2007 and 2010. Before the siege, this figure was more like one in 10.

After ten years, we have never held anyone accountable for one of the biggest lies in American history. Perhaps it would be a useful to look at who benefited from the war.

An official has resigned from the inquiry examining whether British troops abused and tortured Iraqi prisoners because she says it has become "little more than a whitewash".

Alastair Campbell basks in the celebrity limelight, his war crimes expurged from the collective imagination, instead of demanding prosecution alongside those of Tony Blair.

Far too many of those who lied to parliament and people in order to take us in to an illegal and devestating war are still in positions of public power and responsibility.

There have been 96 executions so far for 2012, with another 196 people on death row. Many Iraqis, including former detainees, believe the number is much higher than the government reports.

Tony Blair said the Iraq war was a "blood price" worth paying. But it's not a price he has paid - it's been paid in the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians.

The two main parties -- Labour and Conservative -- which were complicit in going to war are now complicit in preventing the truth about Tony Blair's lies from coming out.

The UK government has introduced its new secrecy law in Parliament, which, if enacted, would mean details of torture scandals like this would be hidden for ever.

In their destruction of the city of Fallujah in 2004, the United States used chemical weapons that have left a horrific legacy for an Iraqi hospital visited by Robert Fisk.

The phosphorus shells that devastated this city were fired in 2004. But are the victims of America's dirty war still being born?

Didn't the mission end without finding the mythical weapons, without forcing the Iraqis to accept US domination, and with the country essentially destroyed?

Should foreigners have any role in building Iraq’s culture of peace? No, says ex-US marine Ross Caputi, Iraqis are quite capable of doing that without the help of Americans.

What's the difference between US soldiers who slaughtered 24 civilians, including women and children and a man in a wheelchair, and the US soldier who helped expose such atrocities?