USA and the War on Terror

Nothing to fear? The hollow laugh of whistleblower Edward Snowden and Osama bin Laden

The British foreign secretary, William Hague, claims "the law-abiding citizen has nothing to fear." It is the cliche of the police state throughout history.

The US should be in the dock, not Bradley Manning

Bradley Manning has done us a service by encouraging us to scrutinise the hidden realities of US power, and consider the dire consequences of decisions shrouded in secrecy.

If Bradley Manning is an enemy of the state then so too is truth

It's not just about Manning: it's about wars in which the resistance to, and exposure of, crimes and abuses has been criminalised while the criminals and abusers go free.

Deny UK foreign policy had anything to do with Woolwich and you come close to excusing the killers

If you deny your enemy any shred of rationality, you come perilously close to excusing him. To be bereft of reason, like a baby or a squirrel, is to be morally innocent.

How the UK security services connect the Woolwich killing to the war on terror

Security service harassment is part of a wider story, not just in the Woolwich killing, but in other cases where torture, rendition and death have been the result, reports John Rees

Who have been the big winners and losers in 12 years of US-UK wars?

Billions spent, hundreds of British soldiers dead and hundreds of thousands of people all over the region slaughtered. For what? asks MP Jeremy Corbyn

Terrorism and wars in Muslim countries: is there any connection?

The politicians who have waged endless wars in Muslim countries are exactly the people who now want to deny any connection between their policy and the rise of terrorism.

Is a 'surgical strike' in Afghanistan any more palatable than a surgical hacking in London?

In essence, is state killing not terrorism? Would the bloody outcomes of Nato strikes ever appear so graphically on front pages the way they have for the Woolwich killing?

Of course UK wars were root cause of Woolwich killing says former British soldier

After Woolwich, says former soldier Joe Glenton, we must make our government end the UK's involvement in vicious foreign occupations that have again created bloodshed in London.

Was the London machete killing of a British soldier really 'terrorism'?

"Terrorism" seems to have no function other than legitimizing the violence of western states against Muslims while delegitimizing all violence done in return to those states.

The lessons to learn from the Woolwich killing are obvious: but not to David Cameron

Any rational balance sheet of the last decade would show that the 'war on terror' has been a failure in its own terms: it has not prevented terrorism but caused it to spread.

America gets explicit: its 'war on terror' is permanent

It is hard to resist the conclusion that this war has no purpose other than its own eternal perpetuation. This war is not a means to any end but rather is the end in itself.

For over 100 hunger strikers, death is preferable to life in Barack Obama's Guantanamo

There is something fundamentally wrong with a system where not being charged with a war crime keeps you locked away indefinitely and a war crime conviction is your ticket home

How many wars is the US fighting today? Many more than you think

Today the US military is involved in scores of countries across all five continents, and its global military facilities make it the world's largest landlord.

Amnesty International should oppose war itself, and not just some of its symptoms

Human rights groups like Amnesty International should target war and militarism itself, rather than just some of its symptoms, and should oppose escalation of war on Syria.

America's endless war against the world: US special forces now operate in 92 countries

In 2001, the US Congress passed a law for the so-called "war on terror" that allows the US government to wage war at anytime, any place and on anyone deemed a threat to national security.